Please Read Me

To understand what this site is attempting to do, you can read my first post “Welcome to the Virtual Party” as an introduction to the whole idea of a “virtual” party.

We have a Blog area where you can create your own magnificent Posts and comment on other people’s attempts at same. We also have a Forum area lovingly maintained by Lady Fly (@beforeyoucanfly). Please visit the forums and chat with other scintillating fellow travellers on a wide range of topics. Access is via the menu at the top of the page.

Some necessary housekeeping: I was hoping to make this site freely available for people to blog and comment on but the forces of greed have intervened.  I am already receiving many comments each day which are spam, advertising cheap shoes or whatever.  If I let people comment freely, the web site would quickly become unusable.  Therefore, I need to check that a comment is a real one before “letting it through”.   Once you have one comment allowed, further comments are not held up. This also means you have to register before you can comment. Again apologies but the greedy low-lives in this world make this, unfortunately, a requirement. So, although I  don’t like those “Your comment is waiting to be moderated” messages as much as the next man, it seems our more entrepreneurial colleagues make some sort of gate an unfortunate necessity.  I’ll try and get to the Comments page regularly and let slip the valid dogs of commentary with appropriate alacrity.

Hope you understand and can find the time to both comment and contribute 🙂


Peter Bayley


When I sat down to add this topic to the list gathered together under the post “Some thoughts on some issues”, I was intending to create one labelled “Indigenous Issues”. The twitter gang had been tweeting extensively about how to talk about indigenous issues, to the point that the growing list of twitter handles left around 20 characters in which to develop a pithy rejoinder.

But as I thought about what I wanted to write, I realised the fact that “indigenous” issues are nothing more than issues of how we treat different members of our society or, more to the point, members of the society who are “different” from us. So I realised a better title is Equality because ultimately, that what this whole topic is about. In the end, the issues are about equality in opportunity, in the protection, encouragement and control our society places on its members and in the sensitivity and tolerance our society has for people who have different values. So here goes my $0.02 on the subject of Equality.

First of all, let me definitely say, people are NOT equal. The American Constitution aside, this is self-evident. In fact, the inequality of people spreads as far as it can, to every single individual being different from every other (even identical twins start diverging, (somatically if not genetically) the moment they become two separate fertilised eggs). To me, this is a clue as to how we approach the equal treatment of all the members of our society. We constantly compare ourselves to others, often forgetting that they have had a completely different genetic base and environment from us and, indeed, from everyone else on the entire planet. We are all of us unique and so can’t be equal. So social equality just cannot be based on anything genetic – male, female, big, small, black, brown, yellow or pink, clever or not. Instead, it needs to be based on outcomes and be targeted to individuals who exhibit something that requires social intervention. If someone is bitten by a snake, we rush them to a clinic or hospital and we treat them with anti-venom or whatever. We do this no matter if the person is young or old, white or black, male or female, Australian or a foreign tourist. The issue is that someone has been bitten and needs treatment and the issue is completely without any other categorisation.

Now how about someone struggling with alcohol. Perhaps they are getting violent when they are drunk and the society decides it needs to step in to save them from injuring either themselves or others. Again, it really shouldn’t matter into which categories the person falls, but what can best be done to ease the situation. If there are a better clinical way of handling a situation when the person has, say a chronic illness, then that information is a useful director into the most appropriate action.

The overwhelming difference between people is between individuals. So all categorisations are generalisations of the true state and often dangerously so. Time was when it might be put about in Australia that Irishmen were all thieves, that Chinese are all penny-pinching or Greeks are all lazy, or New Zealanders are simply magnificent 🙂 These are sweeping generalisations and dangerously so and are, of course, simply not borne out by any facts. There are thieving, penny-pinching, lazy people in all walks of life, of all ages, sexes, ethnicities, etc as well as simply magnificent people everywhere you look.

So my desire would be to have absolutely no mention in any legislation on race or ethnic background, sex or religion, but to identify issues that individuals may have and how society should respond to the issues. If, for example, some people have a connection with certain locations, then that should be considered when legislating about land, regardless of any other factor about the people having the connection.

Categorisation, the allocation of individuals to pre-defined “boxes” is a basic human predisposition and quick categorisation into danger/opportunity has historically helped us tremendously with our survival. The initial categorisation is done immediately and in seconds, and is almost all based on previous and taught experience. “Is this person a danger to me? No, okay, is there an opportunity to gain from an interaction with this person? Can this person inform me more about how the world is, help me to grow, to understand?” To properly participate in a complex, heterogeneous society, we need to be aware that these categorisations are going on but not to act reflexively to them – and, perhaps to evolve them into more accurate and useful categorisations as in – “This person is lying to me – I wonder what they want.”

Now that I’ve so cleverly persuaded you that it’s the interaction of a society with its individuals that matters, the society still needs to decide what are acceptable and unacceptable actions on the part of its members and then to act accordingly. If we as a society decide, for example, that child or forced marriage is wrong, then it should be wrong for all, even for those members practising a religion that condones it. The “category”, for want of a better word to the members of which specific social measures are applied becomes those enforcing the marriage, the parents or legal guardians of the children in question, etc. regardless of religion, age, sex etc.

Some thoughts on some issues

These are, I should stress, my thoughts and my thoughts alone.  In other words they definitely do not represent any formal position of the Virtual Party.  In fact, the Virtual Party doesn’t yet have formal positions on anything, because we don’t yet have a system by which participants can register their preferences by way of a vote.  Instead, this is just one person’s opinions and I’m simply putting them in front of you to get a reaction and, perhaps, to spur you to respond – in righteous indignation, enthusiastic concurrence or anything in between.

The balance of this post is some ideas for topics we could discuss.  I hope, when I get the chance, to expand of these each into its own post, but they will initially exist only here, as the labels of potential ideas, nothing more (Although I have started expanding the Web Democracy post)

I hope you enjoy them.

Peter Bayley

Web Democracy







Web Democracy

Winston Churchill famously said something like “Democracy is the worst political system – except for all the others

The simple idea of everyone in a society getting an equal say in how that society should be governed is a relatively new, and still fragile, concept.

Even the early Democracies of ancient Greece and the United States of America only included male, slave-owning landowners. Universal Suffrage is a very new phenomenon, little more than 100 years or 3-4 generations old.

Democracy provides a say (a “vote”) in who governs at regular intervals called elections. These are typically every 3-4 years and usually represent the sole chance to have your voice heard because, sadly, the ability to meaningfully affect things between elections is almost non-existent.

Consequently, Politicians know they have to go to great lengths to convince the people to vote for them, but are confident, once they are “over the line”, they can relax and not necessarily carry out all, or any, of the promises they made. People might be angry at the flagrant deceit that purchased their vote but nothing can be done until the next election, by which time many injustices have been forgotten.

Things have moved on for our societies since the original concept of a vote, especially in the increased ability, thanks to technology, to freely, easily interact with each other and with those who Govern us.

Democracy over the Internet
Let us contemplate, therefore, the potential impacts to our current democratic process that the Internet represents: a ubiquitous, freely-available interactive communications network linking all the members of the democracy together and with their leaders and potential leaders.  The current tools that effect this communication across the network are Social Media services such as Twitter and Facebook, Instagram etc but, at its base, a secure, web-connected, bi-directional network could be constructed relatively easily using freely-available open-source tools without the need to register with and be controlled by, large US Corporations, especially when those same Corporations are demonstrating their willingness to host manipulative content.

Distributed Democracy
Further, technology allows us to build robust networks without centres or key points of failure that survive parts of the network being compromised or lost. Anything can effectively be anywhere, and people can freely communicate with each other. Technologies, such as BlockChain, are available to ensure the system cannot easily be corrupted.

The Basic Concept of Web Democracy
In order to link the social internet to the democratic process, we introduce the basic concept of one person, one vote. For trialling and development purposes, the people might be members of any small group, but it would eventually be all members of a society eligible to vote.  They would log in and be authenticated (correctly identified), and could then vote by clicking a button on the application or web page they are logged onto, to represent their position on an issue.  Your votes could be requested on many different issues and as part of the many steps that might be taken in developing a policy.  Rather than place one mark on a ballot once in three or four years, the technology would allow us to both indicate and change our preferences as often as desired and on a wide variety of issues with a click of a button.

The same technology would support the policy development process by providing downloadable background documentation.  Chat facilities, blogs and social media would allow people to freely interact and discuss issues, while tools such as Calendars and Event Management could coordinate members in coming together in dates and time and in locations.

Well, while this enhanced ability to vote would be a wonderful improvement on the current system, unfortunately, it’s just not very practical.  You might, for instance, like to read up on all sides of a particular argument – say Public vs Private Hospitals – but there are lots of people saying lots of things on the topic.  You will inevitably find it increasingly difficult to be across all the arguments and information. To solve this problem, we introduce the additional concept of vote delegation

Vote Delegation
When you vote for someone in a normal election, you are effectively ceding them the power to make decisions on your behalf.  Vote Delegation acts the same way but, thanks to the underlying technology, we can improve the process somewhat.
For example, you might provide your vote to one person for anything to do with, say, the environment, but to another person whose ideas on finance you prefer for any decisions about the economy.  Those people use the votes that have been given to them to influence decisions with every vote they have been provided counting towards the outcome of votes taken.

Every time your vote is used by the person to whom you delegated it, you can, if you opt to do so, automatically receive a message, email, SMS, tweet or whatever informing you about what happened – “Richard Smith, your delegate on the Environment used your vote today in favour of this specific proposed policy.

When you delegate your vote to someone, you can also indicate whether the vote can be further delegated. In other words, you can either allow that person to use you vote but not be able to further delegate it to someone else, or allow that person to further delegate his or her pool of votes to another delegate, and so on.

Vote Rescinding and Reallocation
You can take back your vote at any time and give it to someone else, use it yourself or choose not to participate in a particular debate. In that case, you vote is not counted at all.

Vote Allocation
You have one vote that can be used anywhere. However, you can also divide your vote into fractions – for argument’s sake, say 100 pieces. For example, you might equally like the positions of two people in an Environmental debate. Rather than having to make a choice where one gets our full vote and the other nothing, you could, instead, give them each 50% of your vote. You might actually prefer one a little more so give them 75% of your vote and the other 25%. Because the underlying tech can manage all the intricacies of counting up the votes and ensuring no one is able to express more than one vote in total, we can provide voters the subtlety of casting a nuanced vote and more-accurately representing their backing and their wishes.

The net effect of this ability for your vote to be constantly involved in representing your interests should provide much more effective feedback into the political process.  Currently, a politician can and does say anything to convince people to vote for them, understanding that once elected, they can change their mind, not act on their promises etc. When this occurs, in the Web Democracy, the voter can simply take their vote away from that politician, give it to someone else or withdraw it entirely. If sufficient people act similarly, that politician will find they have less voting power and consequently become less powerful and influential.  Conversely, a politician who is seen as doing great work will find a increased flow of votes to them and thus be better-able to make effective changes.

Comments are welcome but I have had such problems with Spam accounts hitting the subscriber system (100’s a day) I no longer allow logins. Instead, you’re welcome to use Twitter where I am @peterbayley.

Virtual Party: Education Points & Plan draft:

Education is a right, not a privilege. Education should not be restricted to or out of reach for any Australian. The future of Australia is dependent on how well we use and therefore how well we educate and prepare knowledge and skills. Education should not be just for those who can afford it or limited by age but the right for all Australians who pursue it. Through better education we achieve greater things as a society and as a country. Our goals are to help facilitate and encourage every Australian to continue to better their opportunities by making education available, affordable and relevant to their and the country’s needs. The reality of the current system where students are encouraged and or compelled to gain a degree by staying within the education system is not the best use of the system for many individuals. Far too many people have degrees in a field they do not practice or work in. This means the qualifications prove only that the individual has demonstrated the ability to learn. Whist this is desirable by some institutions it does not represent good value for the individual who has acquired the debt studying a subject they have now, no interest in. Leaving school and obtaining life skills and work knowledge will for many, lead them to study and acquire qualifications they will apply to their working career and life. This is for some, is a far better advantageous approach. There is also the potential that the individual has made saving in their time in the workforce which can significantly reduce or remove the amount of debt the individual has on completion of their learning.
Virtual Party: Education Points & Plan draft:
• The future of our education program will begin by looking at world’s best practices and adopting and adapting them to suit Australia’s needs, limitations and advantages. All teachers in Australia will be asked to but not compelled to, assist in creating workable platforms for measurable outcomes. It is only through participation and a consulted approach can we expect to achieve a better and a more productive platform of education. We must take into account rural, remote, regional and local needs and limitations and advantages to achieve this goal.
• Primary education: The basics of Maths, English, Reading and Writing will be addressed as the corner stone of early years in education. This will assist and ensure students are adequately prepared for further education and when ready, entering the work force
• Secondary education: Greater emphasis will be placed on advanced primary education skills and learning together with set curriculum classes and elective courses to accommodate the individual’s aspirations. Guidance councillors (G.C.) will meet with students regularly to review the strengths and weakness of their academic status. The G.C. will have the grades of students on hand and will meet with parents and teachers to agree on changes to the student’s curriculum to facilitate means of bring students up to an acceptable standard to achieve adequate grades. The G.C. will also assist in guiding the student towards a career path going forward.
• Higher Learning Education (1): The Technical and Further Education centres will be better funded and reviewed for participation and relevance of courses. Different requirements or industry specific areas may take additional courses whilst others will be moved to more appropriate or industry specific areas. We will seek participation from Companies, Corporations and Institutions to assist in Apprenticeship programs. We will introduce a competition programs between simular programs/courses across the country and seek support from Companies, Corporations and Institutions by way of taking on participants at the completion of the courses with regards to aptitude and relevance of skills and abilities. We will also seek/lobby for participation from State owned media to show case the breadth of talent within these competitions and courses. Individuals who enter the workforce as trainees or apprentices will be reviewed regularly and employers will need to show the individuals have spent a minimum of 60% of their time in the work place in a practical learning environment.
• Higher Learning Education (2): University studies and Degree’s. We will look for ways for all Australians to re-enter the education system as they desire to do so. We will introduce new ways of reducing student debts and investigate ways of increasing the opportunities available them at the completion of their qualification. This will include options such as, students being contracted to work on Governments projects part time to repay loans acquired to facilitate their education. Contracts for minimum time to work in Australia before taking up employment overseas to be considered as a prerequisite for loans. Mentorships will be introduced with successful graduates being able to assist in group participations for understanding the fundamentals of a course or degree. In some cases, entering into a contract where the Government is to be a shareholder in ventures and or technology where it is deemed a greater dividend than the debt is the outcome. The shareholders stake can be sold to other persons and or entities with consideration to its partners and the national interest.
• The Education System in a holistic approach: We will advocate that every person in Australia is able to leave the education system once a year 10 or equivalent has been reached. However, they will be encouraged to return at any time in their life to gain further education whether it be as a trade or and a degree. Recognised Prior Learning (RPL) from work place achievements and knowledge will be assessed through exams and will play a part in fast tracking those already versed in aspects of a course or degree reducing the time out of the work force and the potential of additional debt.
• Some of the points in this plan already exist. However, we will continually through consultation and reviews fine tune these practices. The changes or new aspects are in place to assist the students and education professionals in what is the end goal, which is once entering into mainstream work place the individuals are properly prepared to be constructive and valuable members to their employers.

Draft Environment Policy

Australia has a unique environment that is extremely fragile and needs protection. It includes the world heritage areas of Far North Queensland’s tropical rainforest, the Great Barrier Reef, the Southern Alpine Areas, the beautiful wilderness of the Kimberley & the deserts of Central Australia. Most of these environments are under threat from climate change & development.

We will deliver strong laws to protect these environments their flora and fauna.

We will wOrk with international organisations to move to a sustainable global economy.

A price will be placed on carbon pollution that reflects the social costs of that pollution.

All fossil fuel subsidies will be phased out.

Money raised from the carbon price and withdrawal of fossil fuel subsidies will be used to fund renewable energies including solar, wind & wave energy. This will create thousands of jobs in renewable energy manufacturing that could be exported globally.

No new coal mines or coal mining infrastructure will be developed. Existing coal mines & other fossil fuel mining including coal seam gas will be phased out.

Buildings Regulation.
Building regulations will be introduced to make sure all homes & commercial buildings are properly insulated & have solar panels & hot water systems. Excess energy produced will be bought at the wholesale price of electricity.

Regulations will be introduced to encourage fuel efficient cars & trucks & eventually electric or other non polluting vehicles. The use of public transport will be encouraged & cars banned from central city areas. Bicycle paths will separate cars from bicycles. Networks of bicycle paths will be developed including racks & showers at convenient locations. Most rail lines will be electrified & powered by renewable energy. Long distance freight will be by rail. Fast electric trains will carry passengers between major cities. Aircraft will use biofuels.

Big Fish… Little Fish

A great image by way of @SenatorLudlam’s Twitter feed, for which many thanks and good luck:



… the point of which is also reflected in Margaret Mead’s great quote:

“Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world; indeed, it’s the only thing that ever has.”


None of this is new…

A society is a group of people interacting and communicating towards a mutually-beneficial outcome.   Communications, then, is at the core of what binds a society and communication has recently become an important social phenomenon, surfing a wave of innovative technology to become affordable, ubiquitous and, most importantly, bidirectional.  Unlike previous attempts at wide-ranging communication, the Internet allows everyone for the first time in human history, to be both reader and writer.

Democracy is a mechanism for formalising the wishes of the members of a society.  As such, it is another way in which a society communicates how it feels.  The potential for technology to improve the democratic will has only recently become available but its potential is enormous.

Interest in the meeting point of  human society and ways of communicating is not new.  What IS new is the enhanced ability of ALL members of a group to actively contribute, using, but not limited to,  the current “social” technologies of FaceBook and Twitter.

Others have considered these issues before us and we can only benefit from familiarising ourselves with their thoughts.  To this end, I would like to suggest we all contribute links to and quotes from other sources of information and opinion on this exciting new “Techno-Social”  world.  We can read each other’s contributions and thus enrich our discussions.

I will start the ball rolling by pointing to an interesting site by Pia Waugh @piawaugh and Will Grant @willozap  called Society 5.   It was launched two years ago and has not really taken off so far, but that doesn’t diminish it as a source of some interesting writings on the ‘Social Internet”.

Pia’s a rather dynamic young lady in Canberra whom I have yet to meet, but whoi I follow in twitter and who inspires with talk about Open Government, Open Society and Open Information. 

Pia and Will also mention, on their site, another initiative, also in its infancy, called “Distributed Democracy” which you may also find of interest.

I leave it to you to read and comment, but please also contribute your thoughts and links to things that moved you and so might move us.

In the end, it’s not important which of these many, halting attempts at starting a discussion succeed or fail. The beginnings of such a comprehensive subject as how we live together on our ball of dust will necessarily be messy, confusing, even cacophonous.  That fact in no way reduces the importance of continuing the discussion and just talking together.

Party Objectives: The government is here for a term, the people are here for life and the decisions of government should reflect this. draft

The aim of the Virtual Party is to offer, for all Australians a true democracy not the current perverse sense of democracy which, currently works for politicians and party lines and against the people of Australia.
All people will have the opportunity to vote on almost all points before the government. The only items which will not be offered through this system of voting are those relating to national security where the exposure would leave our country open to a disadvantage security risk in a global field. You will have the ability to vote for or against all domestic policies and laws which would come before the government.
Initially, we will try to bring pressure to bear on members of the government and mainstream parties to vote as you the public have asked/indicated would be your preference.
If this fails to achieve the desired objective/results, we will seek to assist the election of an independent candidate who is willing to take your voice before the government.
If this option also fails to reach the desired result, we will register as a political party in its own right and seek suitable candidates to run for seats/office where your voice will be our voice ensuring our mantra of a true and free democracy will vote accordingly.
The Australian Constitution says, an elected member will re-present on behalf of the people. Over many years and many governments this simple yet crucial phrase has been perverted in the vested interest of politicians and parties to read, the member will represent the people. The difference between these two phrases is that they are miles apart in interpretation. Currently, once you elect a member, your voice is lost for the term of the government. The party policy must be adhered to by any member of the party. If your views differ from the patties view you are ignored and try as you may through demonstrations, petitions etc. you have no voice and no way to change that which you have a right to change. Your views and or dissent have no effect. Promises are lies in waiting.
Example: In recent surveys the Australian people have been asked if they would support same sex marriage. Although this is a philosophical and an emotional issue, more than 80% of Australians were of the affirmative in acceptance. Yet, the government refused to make the necessary amendments and accept the will of the people. The church and the state collude and conspire to prevent democracy and to refuse your right to have change.
We will not prevent you from being progressive but support your desires for change, seeking to repeal unjust laws and amendments to the constitution which remove or restrict your rights but only if the Australian public/citizens numbers support those changes and repeals.
The separation between state and church along with affiliations with big business and unions will not happen under our banner. No contributions to campaign funds be accepted by business interests or unions, we will remain independent to all interest except those of the Australian people.
Ladies and Gentlemen, This is true Democracy.

Mission Statement: draft

Points: – 1) transparency – The web site will show the number of people who voted in the affirmative and the negative for each item before the public for voting
2) Democracy – We vote how you have asked us to vote. Not the way of a party line (as there is no party line with in the Virtual Party, it is a true democracy). We do not vote for what we believe is the best action to take but as the numbers for the affirmative have shown or told us is the desired action of the people.
3) Pros and Cons debate papers – Groups from either side of an argument will be asked to submit papers outlining the reason they are for and against issues to be voted on. These papers will be published on the web site for all members of the public to read before you make cast your vote for action to be taken by the party.
4) An Open Party – We will take on board any ideas or issues you want raised and addressed through forum pages on our web site. Items which raise sufficient interests and awareness will be elevated to points we will take on the people’s behalf, to the government. Your passion and your ability to raise awareness will be key to getting sufficient votes to have your issues elevated to item 3) pros and Cons section of the web site.

everyone is here…